EV_MULTI_008 — Buyer-reported reconciled trial migration before cutover

Structured buyer-interview evidence for a reconciled trial migration of sales orders and accounts receivable invoices run before production cutover, reported across 25 buyer accounts of 20 to 100 employees operating a single site and collectively spanning all seven current verticals. The reported basis is production usage analytics. No measured value, numeric threshold, interview date, observation period, or per-vertical count was supplied.

kind: evidence_catalog
schema_version: 1
evidence:
  - id: EV_MULTI_008
    type: buyer_interview
    title: 'Buyer-reported reconciled trial migration before cutover'
    source: >-
      Structured buyer-interview responses relayed during the interactive
      create-proof authoring session for P_00012, S_00011, and PF_MULTI_006 on
      2026-08-02. The reported population was 25 buyer accounts of 20 to 100
      employees operating a single site, collectively spanning all seven current
      verticals. The reported basis was production usage analytics of those
      accounts' own migrations, not a controlled trial run for this proof.
      Exact interview dates, observation period, account identities, counts per
      vertical, measured values, and any separate transcript or recording
      reference were not supplied.
    publisher_or_owner: >-
      Buyer participants across 25 buyer accounts, relayed by Gabriel Paunescu;
      exact identities and roles per account were not supplied
    published_at: null
    accessed_at: 2026-08-02
    supports:
      - >-
        Buyers at 25 reported accounts of 20 to 100 employees operating a single
        site, collectively spanning M1_V1 through M1_V7, reported that a trial
        migration of sales orders and accounts receivable invoices was run and
        reconciled before production cutover was approved.
      - >-
        The reported reconciliation method was record counts, financial control
        totals, and sampled document links between imported invoices and the
        sales orders the migration had already created.
      - >-
        The buyers reported accepting the reconciliation result before cutover.
        The numeric thresholds they accepted were not supplied.
      - >-
        The reported observation basis was production usage analytics rather
        than a demonstration or evaluation package constructed for this proof.
    scope: >-
      Buyer-reported production migration use across 25 buyer accounts of 20 to
      100 employees operating a single site, collectively spanning M1_V1, M1_V2,
      M1_V3, M1_V4, M1_V5, M1_V6, and M1_V7.
    confidence: medium
    notes: >-
      User-provided wording preserved faithfully includes: "yes →
      buyer_interview"; "25 customers, 20 - 100 size, single site"; "production
      usage analytics"; "all" in answer to which of counts, control totals,
      relationship samples, exception tolerance, and trial-repeat counts exist;
      and "they accepted" in answer to what the buyer agreed to accept. The
      contributor initially stated "all was measured through the audit trails"
      and, when shown that data-import-ai/import-in-progress-sales-orders
      bypasses audit-trail processing through skipEvent() and that revisions are
      disabled on both finance/invoice and sales/order, corrected the
      reconciliation method to record counts, financial control totals, and
      sampled document links. The audit-trail statement is withdrawn and is not
      evidence. No measured value was supplied for any reconciliation category,
      so this record establishes that the categories were reported as measured
      and accepted, not what any of them equalled. Buyers did not answer in this
      session. Interview dates, observation period, per-vertical counts, account
      identities, and any transcript, recording, screenshot, or export were not
      supplied, and no customer system or database was inspected.

Outstanding

1. No measured value is recorded. Obtain the reconciled counts, financial control totals, relationship match rates, exception tolerances, and number of trial repeats before any quantified claim is made from this record.
2. Vertical span is reported, not separately observed. Obtain per-vertical account counts before treating M1_V1 through M1_V7 membership as individually validated.
3. Provenance is incomplete. Interview dates, observation period, and account identities were not supplied, and buyers did not answer directly in the authoring session.