EV_MULTI_005 — Buyer-observed work-order reprogramming through reflow and date editing

Structured buyer-interview evidence for production work-order reprogramming through both Reflow Work Orders and direct planned-date editing. The interview scope covered 25 production manufacturer accounts across all seven current verticals over one year. Exact calendar dates, account identities, detailed before-and-after schedule values, and customer artifacts were not supplied.

kind: evidence_catalog
schema_version: 1
evidence:
  - id: EV_MULTI_005
    type: buyer_interview
    title: 'Buyer-observed work-order reprogramming through reflow and date editing'
    source: >-
      Structured buyer-interview responses supplied during the interactive
      Codex create-proof task for P_00006 and S_00005 on 2026-08-01.
      The interview scope covered 25 production manufacturer accounts over
      one year. Exact interview dates, observation-period dates, account
      identities, and a separate transcript or recording reference were not
      supplied.
    publisher_or_owner: >-
      VP of Manufacturing and Accounting participant (direct buyer
      interviewees; exact Accounting title not supplied)
    published_at: null
    accessed_at: 2026-08-01
    supports:
      - >-
        The buyer-interview responses stated that production work orders were
        reprogrammed through both the Reflow Work Orders feature and direct
        editing of planned dates.
      - >-
        The supplied scope covered 25 production manufacturer accounts across
        M1_V1, M1_V2, M1_V3, M1_V4, M1_V5, M1_V6, and M1_V7 during a one-year
        production observation period.
      - >-
        The supplied buyer acceptance/result was: "reflow was correctly set."
    scope: >-
      Buyer-reported production use across 25 manufacturing accounts spanning
      M1_V1, M1_V2, M1_V3, M1_V4, M1_V5, M1_V6, and M1_V7 over one year.
    confidence: high
    notes: >-
      User-provided wording preserved faithfully: "orders can be reprogrammed
      using the reflow feature or simply editing the dates"; "production. all
      verticals"; "25 production manufacturer accounts"; "both"; and "reflow
      was correctly set." The exact Accounting title, account identities,
      calendar dates, representative before-and-after assignments or planned
      dates, number of observations per vertical, changed constraints, and
      started-work behavior were not supplied. No recording, transcript,
      screenshot, export, or customer system was inspected. This evidence
      supports observed work-order date reprogramming and the stated buyer
      acceptance wording; it does not establish initial work-order generation,
      compatible work-center assignment, dependency correctness, preservation
      of started work, global schedule optimality, or any quantified
      improvement.